Does technology wealth trickle down to others?


In the September 27th, 2016 issue, the Economist revealed some interesting facts regarding the “new” technology economy: “[i]n 1990 the top three carmakers in Detroit between them had nominal revenues of $250 billion, a market capitalization of $36 billion and 1.2m employees. In 2014 the top three companies in Silicon Valley had revenues of $247 billion and a market capitalization [sic] of over $1 trillion but just 137,000 employees. “ That wealth contrast is better illustrated by the equivalent of wealth difference with $7,300,000 per employee (new economy) versus  $30,000 per employee (old economy).  And the Silicon Valley nurtures that growth by investing in similar software companies, vastly outdistancing itself from the rest of the United States, if not the world.  In the PWC Moneytree Report, 2016 Q2, Silicon Valley investments in software technology for the last quarter exceeded over $5.5 billion, over 340 percent multiples from the next highest investment region, Orange County. How does the older, blue collar, middle class guy benefit from this new economy?

Now, I have driven by Tesla’s Fremont, California manufacturing facility and I did not witness not even one Tesla in the employee parking lot.  The automated manufacturing facility does not compensate enough or price its hallmark products for the middle class. Let us go back less than hundred years ago, when Henry Ford assured that all of his employees could purchase its Model T Ford as it came out of the factory.  And he achieved that promise.  Every employee shared in the wealth of the Ford Company, not just the senior managers.  Nowadays you hear of the hidden unemployment population—workers who had had no success re-entering the working economy.  And this is what the new economy really delivers – an upper and upper-middle class with considerable wealth, those from Silicon Valley, blocking out any potential for the lower and middle classes.

I don’t see any of trickle down wealth in this “new” economy.  And it concerns me.  The
“new” economy rewards the “under 30” generation in Silicon Valley.  Anyone over the age of 30 has a rat’s ass chance of getting any investments from any Silicon Valley VC. This blind, “technology” mindset culture accelerates this one-sided wealth from the rest of the economy.  And this new economy is selfish. When there was a ballot to tax technology companies to fund programs for homeless people littering all throughout the streets of San Francisco, the ballot was knocked down.  I guess that the Silicon Valley people do not believe that in a rising tide that all boats should rise – only those with jobs and stock options in technology companies should benefit from the rising tides.

Now, I foresee the exhaustion of the so-called digital markets—there is a limit what Facebook can do to its website. In response, Facebook expands its product lines to include overly priced VR hardware. Meanwhile, search engines like Google can only program to death its ability to find information and associate the searches with the users. Yahoo, AOL, and others disappeared. So there is a limit what “shrink warp” software can do.

In my previous blogs, I have clearly shown that the profitability of “shrink wrap” software is extraordinary.  In today’s world, however, one finds software companies entering enterprise niches or the HW side of business—a new frontier for them. That suggests that any new software markets are shrinking. And the Economist pointed out that they sustain the market dominance through acquisition at other technology markets — from software platforms to hardware.

As an example, after his huge success with PayPal, Elon Musk enters into the rocketry business.  Is it successful? I doubt any insurance company will insure my passage on one of his rockets – regardless of his earlier success with Paypal.  So we know already, even not easily recognizable in Silicon Valley, software programming skills do not translate well into the HW world.

We also know that software pedigrees from Google or Stanford University do not guarantee success – in fact, can lead to huge financial disasters – e.g. Theranos and, now, Yahoo. (Out of curiosity, when the Yahoo system was hacked for +500 million users, why did this surface recently, and not revealed in their SEC filings in 2014? Just to protect the senior management’s bonuses?)   The loses between those two companies exceed $20 billion by misleading information and poor management. So we know now that Silicon Valley software technology managers are not bullet proof.  And yet the lower classes still receive no economic benefits.

Interestingly, in my recent visit to China on technology, I toured a car manufacturing factory all automated. Then I thought that a country with over 1.3 billion people what would happen to the older generation of potential employees displace by technology. There is nothing wrong with technology – as long as every segment of the society benefits, not just a few.

The key here is that societies need to evaluate how to trickle this wealth to the older, lower classes.  No society can survive if it is economically bifurcated. We have observed what happens from the French and Russian revolutions.  There is nothing to stop for history to repeat itself – even in America.  The Republican presidential nominee seems to be bellweather that this unrest is fuming since his considerable political support originates from the very economic classes being impacted by the new economy.  We need a better solution that allows technological wealth spread to other economic classes.


About Juan Ramón Zarco, SVVGP 胡安•雷蒙•扎尔科

Juan Ramon Zarco, 胡安•雷蒙•扎尔科, Silicon Valley Ventures Growth Partners llp, Hygieia Healthcare Technologies Company, AllRest Technologies LLC, Crimson Growth Partners LLP,, is an experienced as CxO, General Counsel and Secretary to public and private companies with global operations. Established track record of producing practical, revenue-focused solutions. As Counselor and Secretary, demonstrating vision, integrity, and sound business judgment, to CxOs. Managed complex, strategic transactions, M&A, contracts support, PE Financing, IPO, SEC compliance, Corporate/HR governance, IP licensing, Budgeting, Staff, outside counsel management, International market access strategies, Domestic & foreign government relations and advocacy. Creative in designing and implementing market access strategies. Practices law beyond conventional model with low-overhead and project-based fees. Effective at managing departments, formulating marketing strategies, balancing budgets, and implementing cost-saving measures. Extensive in-house and private practice experience, advising clients on commercial, corporate, international business, and technology law and policy.; For Sprint, he managed iDen international development in Southeast Asia, Middle East, and Africa, and contractual issues with Verizon. In Private Equity, he worked with Pegasus in vetting international investment deals and interim President for portfolio companies, such as Data Foundation, a data storage company, handling marketing, strategy, fund raising, and accounting. Before Pegasus, Mr. Zarco, as CLO and V.P. of Corporate Development, played a principal role in the structuring, international expansions for 2 telecom companies, U.S. Cable Group and Viatel, Inc. in financing and M&A deals exceeding $200 million. Mr. Zarco earned a J.D. from NYU Law School, M.B.A. from Cornell, and B.A. from Williams College; is fluent in Spanish, Portuguese, French, and German, with working knowledge of Russian, Arabic and Japanese.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Does technology wealth trickle down to others?

  1. Brad K says:

    Again your post makes an important point here that I can specifically relate to. Now that a prototype, for a consumer good product that I’ve been working, on is coming to fruition I’ve been doing some casual investigation of some financing possibilities. (Ironically, this is what probably led me here at one point.)

    When you look into angel or VC investing you’ll find an overwhelming number of them that promote and prefer ‘Technology’ – though ‘app’ would probably be a more appropriate term. Someone that is looking for investment for a physical product needs to go the extra mile to find ppl/firms that invest specifically in just that and not HW as it relates to electronics and technology.

    If I could be so bold to post a link to a blog post at that lists a few HW (in every sense) investors:

    I’ve been waiting for your posts to start again and you didn’t disappoint. A great pair of articles!

  2. Thanks for your comment, Brad. Yes– they invest in SW because that is where the money is. It is not about “changing the World”. If that were true, we’d see more HW improvements. And I spent a couple of weeks in Asia, so I didn’t get a chance to post except I had a lot of time to think of +15 hours of flight. I am critical of Silicon Valley mindset and its arrogance. Why is AirBnB attracts so much investment in the billions (by economic definition, that reduces investments on other worthwhile things) for a piece of crap software claiming to be the world’s largest hotel???? A software my grandmother can write? Is that technology? No — just cash flow.

  3. Just a note of caution — focus on the products and getting traction. Not sure how “international law” has impact on your product, given that Intl Law deals only with nations and treaties– something I am very familiar with. Patent registrations can only do so much and lawyers tend to benefit the most. Read my earlier blogs. Get distribution alliance or sales. Look at my earlier blog on “traction”.

  4. Brad K says:

    When I enter ‘Traction’ into your search bar I find that I’ve already previously read all of those articles at one point or another. Domestic traction is exactly what I’m focusing on now as I prep the marketing campaign and oversee the creation of the website. (I can’t wait to finally lose the @gmail email address I still use everywhere.)

    I’m generally the among the most pessimistic people in a group and I even have to acknowledge that I think this product could have some legs out of the gate. In fact, as of two days ago I got a text from a guy at the shop, that I’ve only met a handful of times over the course of the last three years, that told me that he had just visited a gun shop in Phoenix where he found out that the owners there are very interested in what I’m doing. He had only really learned about my product approx 12 hours earlier at the shop here in San Diego (apparently he does a lot of travel for his job). He was very impressed with what I showed him and, the kicker is, he’s not even a ‘shooter’, just someone super impressed with my prototype.

    Over the years I’ve had lifelong NRA members request to be customer #1, non-shooters use the term ‘revolutionary’, hunters and members of the police force that are extremely interested (disclaimer; these are two different groups of family members), and even a former editor of GUNS magazine testify to the USPTO of my patents legitimacy. And now a non-shooter, that I’ve only spoke with a few times, that is spreading the word to gun shops in another state about this.

    I don’t think that traction is going to be a problem. 🙂

    (Intl law comes later.)

  5. Amazing stuff, very enlightening keep up!

  6. Pingback: Final Reflection – Teaching and Learning in the Digital World

  7. Pingback: Is the average taxpayer subsidizing those wonderfully, successful Silicon Valley companies much too much? | Simple Advice for Entrepreneurs on Capital, Strategy, Legal Services, Management, Entrepreneurship, VC Funding and other things – Juan Ramon

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s